Skip to main content

New. CPO Rollout Blueprint — evaluate migrations without lock-in risk.

Read blueprintRead

Comparison

GridOS vs SteVe

Compare GridOS and SteVe for OCPP charge point management. GridOS offers managed routing, migration support, and operational tooling, while SteVe is a self-hosted open-source path for teams that want direct code control.

Best for

Operators deciding whether to invest in platform operations internally or use a managed OCPP layer built for staged rollout.

Buyer lens

Engineering-led teams comparing self-hosted open source with a managed infrastructure layer.

How to read this page

  • This page is not asking which vendor has the longest feature list.
  • It is asking where the charger-facing layer should live and how much backend change your team can absorb safely.
  • Use the table as an architecture and migration lens first, then validate commercial fit second.
Feature comparison between GridOS and SteVe
FeatureGridOSSteVe
Managed SaaSIncludedNot included
Self-hosted open sourceNot includedIncluded
OCPP 1.6 + 2.0.1 handlingIncludedIncluded
Multi-backend routingIncludedNot included
OCPI roaming workflowsIncludedCommunity or custom work
Built-in migration supportIncludedNot included
Operational monitoring and rollback modelIncludedEngineering-owned
Source-code ownershipNot includedIncluded

Bottom line

Choose GridOS if you want managed infrastructure, migration support, and lower operational overhead. Choose SteVe if you want open-source control and are prepared to own hosting, scaling, integration, and long-term maintenance yourself.

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers for teams shortlisting vendors through the migration and interoperability lens.

Due diligence

Questions that usually decide the shortlist

  • Can the platform coexist with your current backend during migration?
  • Can your team export sessions, CDRs, and charger events without friction?
  • Does the rollout model preserve rollback and commercial flexibility?